8 h sitten
$SOL | Solana is Resilient and Decentralized.
Here is why that matters as an investor:
🔸Risk mitigation -> Lowers volatility from outages/attacks
🔸Security -> Protects against centralization threats
🔸Growth potential -> Attracts capital and users
In essence, as an investor, choosing decentralized and resilient networks like Solana means aligning with assets that are built to endure market cycles, attract adoption, and deliver returns on investment.
If decentralization is weak, your investment could face existential risks.
Still not convinced Solana is decentralized after quoted thread?
Here are some additional metrics:
🔸1,295 Total Active Nodes (aggregated based on other sources: 1,982)
🔸Validators are spread across 78 countries (clusters in US, Europe and Asia)
🔸68% of validators run on diverse cloud providers, 25% on on-premises hardware, and 7% on AWS
🔸Nakamoto Coefficient of 23 (based on the top 23 validators controlling 33% of stake)
Solana exemplifies effective decentralization by maintaining a low AWS dependency, achieving zero throughput impact during outages, and sustaining 100% uptime.
Therefore $SOL is and remains my number 1 altcoin investment.
9 h sitten
$SOL | Solana's Resilience During AWS Outages
Have you ever wondered why some blockchains stop working during cloud problems?
It's not just bad luck: it's centralization.
Diving into fresh data from AWS Blockchain Tracker on blockchain reliance on @awscloud.
Spoiler: It's worse than you think.
EVERY network with >40% AWS dependency saw significant performance degradation during outages. There is a strong correlation between centralizing infrastructure (hello, AWS) and vulnerability.
Decentralization isn't optional; it's survival.
Solana leads with a Resilience Index of 97.6. Solana 's low dependency (<20% per report metrics) meant zero major disruptions during the last three AWS events. TX throughput? Held steady at 2k+ TPS. This isn't luck; it's smart infra: Multi-cloud + on-chain optimizations.
If you're building or investing, study @solana's Multi-Cloud strategy.
Layer 2s average 46.7% (!) AWS dependency. 2.2x higher than L1's 21.0%. @base has been flagged as a prime risk case, with a Centralization Risk of 16.3. 65%+ AWS exposure led to 40%+ downtime spikes.
Heavy AWS lean-in means one outage = chain-wide chaos.
Lesson for L2s: Diversify your infra or pay the price.
True decentralization starts with infra. Ditch the cloud monopolies where you can and explore multi-cloud, on-prem, or edge solutions.
Let's build tougher networks.
3,94 t.
14
Tällä sivulla näytettävä sisältö on kolmansien osapuolten tarjoamaa. Ellei toisin mainita, OKX ei ole lainatun artikkelin / lainattujen artikkelien kirjoittaja, eikä OKX väitä olevansa materiaalin tekijänoikeuksien haltija. Sisältö on tarkoitettu vain tiedoksi, eikä se edusta OKX:n näkemyksiä. Sitä ei ole tarkoitettu minkäänlaiseksi suositukseksi, eikä sitä tule pitää sijoitusneuvontana tai kehotuksena ostaa tai myydä digitaalisia varoja. Siltä osin kuin yhteenvetojen tai muiden tietojen tuottamiseen käytetään generatiivista tekoälyä, tällainen tekoälyn tuottama sisältö voi olla epätarkkaa tai epäjohdonmukaista. Lue aiheesta lisätietoa linkitetystä artikkelista. OKX ei ole vastuussa kolmansien osapuolten sivustojen sisällöstä. Digitaalisten varojen, kuten vakaakolikoiden ja NFT:iden, omistukseen liittyy suuri riski, ja niiden arvo voi vaihdella merkittävästi. Sinun tulee huolellisesti harkita, sopiiko digitaalisten varojen treidaus tai omistus sinulle taloudellisessa tilanteessasi.