Il y a 8Â h
$SOL | Solana is Resilient and Decentralized.
Here is why that matters as an investor:
đžRisk mitigation -> Lowers volatility from outages/attacks
đžSecurity -> Protects against centralization threats
đžGrowth potential -> Attracts capital and users
In essence, as an investor, choosing decentralized and resilient networks like Solana means aligning with assets that are built to endure market cycles, attract adoption, and deliver returns on investment.
If decentralization is weak, your investment could face existential risks.
Still not convinced Solana is decentralized after quoted thread?
Here are some additional metrics:
đž1,295 Total Active Nodes (aggregated based on other sources: 1,982)
đžValidators are spread across 78 countries (clusters in US, Europe and Asia)
đž68% of validators run on diverse cloud providers, 25% on on-premises hardware, and 7% on AWS
đžNakamoto Coefficient of 23 (based on the top 23 validators controlling 33% of stake)
Solana exemplifies effective decentralization by maintaining a low AWS dependency, achieving zero throughput impact during outages, and sustaining 100% uptime.
Therefore $SOL is and remains my number 1 altcoin investment.
Il y a 9Â h
$SOL | Solana's Resilience During AWS Outages
Have you ever wondered why some blockchains stop working during cloud problems?
It's not just bad luck: it's centralization.
Diving into fresh data from AWS Blockchain Tracker on blockchain reliance on @awscloud.
Spoiler: It's worse than you think.
EVERY network with >40% AWS dependency saw significant performance degradation during outages. There is a strong correlation between centralizing infrastructure (hello, AWS) and vulnerability.
Decentralization isn't optional; it's survival.
Solana leads with a Resilience Index of 97.6. Solana 's low dependency (<20% per report metrics) meant zero major disruptions during the last three AWS events. TX throughput? Held steady at 2k+ TPS. This isn't luck; it's smart infra: Multi-cloud + on-chain optimizations.
If you're building or investing, study @solana's Multi-Cloud strategy.
Layer 2s average 46.7% (!) AWS dependency. 2.2x higher than L1's 21.0%. @base has been flagged as a prime risk case, with a Centralization Risk of 16.3. 65%+ AWS exposure led to 40%+ downtime spikes.
Heavy AWS lean-in means one outage = chain-wide chaos.
Lesson for L2s: Diversify your infra or pay the price.
True decentralization starts with infra. Ditch the cloud monopolies where you can and explore multi-cloud, on-prem, or edge solutions.
Let's build tougher networks.
3,94Â k
14
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX nâest pas lâauteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit dâauteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă titre dâinformation uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions dâOKX. Il ne sâagit pas dâune approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation dâachat ou de vente dâactifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč lâIA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou dâautres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire lâarticle associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et dâinformations. OKX nâest pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques vous convient.